When I wrote my last post, I framed it in the context of a “contract.”
But, that said, I do not want to discourage exponential thinking as a whole. It is good to be able to conceptualize on an exponential basis.
It’s good to be able to think beyond the “linear.”
I just didn’t want us to be bound to exponential thinking as a path we must take. My last post was written to provide a choice.
You think the way you want to think. Don’t be bound by anyone’s exponential contract.
But, think exponentially, because then you’ll be able to more accurately “see” where the “contract” is leading.